Is a star pass satisfactory? - Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Is a star pass satisfactory?


Jan 1, 1998

Q: When testing a Category 5 cable run we read a star pass on the remote near-end crosstalk. The margin was 1.7. Is this acceptable? The cable manufacturer said that even if the margin were 0, the test would be satisfactory.

Harold Hoffman

Hoffman Electric

Lake Ariel, PA

A: The cable manufacturer is correct in that the cable passes the telecommunications systems bulletin tsb-67 criterion, even down to zero margin.

In the years since tsb-67 was first published, many Category 5 cable constructions have been brought to the market. Variations in jacketing material, conductor insulation, and physical shape have created performance inconsistencies between different Category 5 cables.

"Meets or exceeds Category 5" can be seen in ad after ad--for cables that just pass Category 5 to cables that exceed two times the Category 5 requirements. So how can you tell? Attenuation-to-crosstalk ratio (acr) has become the benchmark. acr is determined by the difference between near-end crosstalk and attenuation at specific frequencies. As an example, let`s use the worst-case numbers from tia/eia-568a; a cable with 32-decibel crosstalk and 22-dB attenuation at 100 megahertz would have an acr value of 10 dB (32 - 22 = 10) at 100 MHz.

Currently the Gigabit Ethernet Alliance of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (ieee--Washington, DC) is developing a gigabit standard titled "1000Base-T for utp," targeted for completion in September 1998. The emerging gigabit standard for Ethernet will be based upon generic Category 5 cabling. The ieee standards committee evaluated two proposals: (1) to support horizontal distances of 50 to 60 meters with inexpensive electronic hubs or (2) to support 100 meters with expensive and complex electronic hubs. They decided to support proposal (2). Studies have shown that Category 5 performance is inadequate for robust 100-meter solutions using inexpensive electronic hub technology.

Donna Ballast is a communications analyst at The University of Texas at Austin and a BISCI registered communications distribution designer (RCDD). Questions can be sent to her at:

Cabling Installation & Maintenance or at PO Drawer 7580,

The University of Texas,

Austin, TX 78713;

tel: (512) 471-0112,

fax: (512) 471-8883,

e-mail: ballast@utexas.edu.


We Recommend

Skeletons in the telecom closet: The 10 scariest things I've seen this year

The 11 biggest cabling stories of 2011

Free app calculates loss budget

Reference poster dissects 802.11n

Fiber installation courses available online

Counterfeit cable exposed

Making the switch from 62.5- to 50-micron fiber

Telecom grounding and bonding standard published by NECA and BICSI

Free poster highlights 10 fiber-safety rules


Most Popular Articles
Top Blog Posts

TIA sets objectives for 40G over twisted pair

Cancer patients miss surgery due to cable theft

Cable tech finds 500-pound bear in customer’s basement

Nearly-electrocuted copper-cable thief speaks remorsefully

House explosions, captured on video, blamed on cable theft

Modified U.S. Army drone spies on WiFi users

Turn a wiring cabinet into a liquor cabinet


Receive Free E-mail Newsletters from Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Want to hear about more articles like this one? Sign up for our free email newsletters.



Email:

First Name:

Last Name:

Promo Code (optional):

Country:

Available Newsletters:
Cabling News

Data Centers Report

Contractor Report

 


Cabling Installation & Maintenance Topic and Resource Categories:

Data CentersCabling Standards
Network CableConnectivity Technologies
Network ProtocolsIP Convergence
WirelessDesign, Installation & Testing
Current IssueArchives
Cabling BlogBuyer's Guide