Belden raises yellow flag on use of 24-fiber MPO connectors

Aug. 7, 2013
Blog post says ‘the technology is not all it’s cracked up to be,’ citing limitations caused by the connector’s loss performance.

In a blog post, Belden fiber-connectivity solutions product manager Dwayne Crawford raises a yellow flag on the idea of implementing the 24-fiber MPO connector in data center environments. Several cabling providers, including Leviton Network Solutions (here) and TE Connectivity (here), have advocated the use of the 24-fiber MPO and made the case for that interface’s benefits in accommodating the migration from 10- to 40- and 100-Gbit/sec Ethernet transmission over multimode fiber.

Not so fast, says Belden’s Crawford. Citing the forthcoming 100GBase-SR4 specification—sometimes referred to as the 4x25 version of 100G because it will transmit 25-Gbit/sec data per pair over 4 fibers, and receive 25-Gbit/sec data over another 4 fibers—Crawford says that once 100G can run over 8 fibers rather than the 20 multimode fibers it currently requires, “We’re back to using the 12-fiber MPO solutions.” He says that is “precisely why I do not recommend the use of 24-fiber MPO solutions today.”

Take Our Poll: For your network, how far down the road is 100G?

But there’s more than fiber counts to consider, he emphasizes. “Optical loss budget is a big concern among data center managers,” he says, “and due to limitations in the protocol, standards now require a total connector loss budget of 1.0 dB for 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet channels.” That’s an issue because, as Crawford explains, “A 24-fiber MPO connector typically has a loss of 0.5 dB.” He contrasts that with the 0.2-dB loss performance of Belden’s 12-fiber MPOs. The disparity, he says, “is mainly due to the fact that the more fibers in a connector, the higher the loss, and the 24-fiber MPO connector and its endface geometry are more difficult to manufacture and control than a 12-fiber MPO.”

A 24-fiber MPO with such high loss limits a channel to having 2 mated pairs, eliminating the flexibility of a crossconnect architecture or the use of a zone distribution area, Crawford points out. He sums up by saying, “While a 24-fiber MPO solution might work for simple, point-to-point architecture, the reality is that the technology is not all it’s cracked up to be.”

You can read his full blog post, titled “24-fiber MPO solutions: A true caveat emptor,” here.

Take Our Poll: For your network, how far down the road is 100G?

Sponsored Recommendations

Power up your system integration with Pulse Power - the game-changing power delivery system

May 10, 2023
Pulse Power is a novel power delivery system that allows System Integrators to safely provide significant power, over long distances, to remote equipment. It is a Class 4 power...

The Agile and Efficient Digital Building

May 9, 2023
This ebook explores how intelligent building solutions can help businesses improve network infrastructure management and optimize data center operations in enterprise buildings...

400G in the Data Center

Aug. 3, 2022
WHATS NEXT FOR THE DATA CENTER: 400G and Beyond

Network Monitoring- Why Tap Modules?

May 1, 2023
EDGE™ and EDGE8® tap modules enable passive optical tapping of the network while reducing downtime and link loss and increasing rack space utilization and density. Unlike other...