TIA's great Category 8 debate and ISO/IEC's cabling update

May 28, 2013
Unlike previous standards, Category 8 as proposed is not an electrical-performance superset of Category 7A.

From the May, 2013 Issue of Cabling Installation & Maintenance Magazine

Unlike previous standards, Category 8 as proposed is not an electrical-performance superset of Category 7A.

By Valerie Maguire, The Siemon Company

After debating the issue for three meeting cycles, the TIA TR-42.7 Copper Cabling Subcommittee adopted "Category 8" as the name of its next-generation balanced twisted-pair cabling system that is currently under development to support 40-Gbit/sec transmission in a two-connector channel over some distance up to at least 30 meters. The issue of what to call this new system was a subject close to the hearts of many subcommittee members; both proponents and opponents of the new name argued tenaciously for their positions. However, the real question is just how much confusion the name Category 8 is going to cause for the industry.

Traditionally cabling categories are supersets of each other, meaning that a higher category of cabling meets or exceeds all of the electrical and mechanical requirements of a lower category of cabling, and is also backward-compatible with the lower-performing category. While TIA specifies cabling systems up to Category 6A performance, TIA chose not to adopt Category 7 or 7A as published by ISO/IEC. TIA has now decided to call its next-generation cabling system "Category 8" to avoid confusion with published ISO/IEC Category 7 and Category 7A standards, which are indeed supersets of each other and of Category 6A. While it is true that the currently proposed Category 8 specifications tentatively describe transmission performance up to 2 GHz, whereas ISO/IEC specifies Category 7A requirements up to 1 GHz, the performance limits proposed for Category 8 as of March 2013 do not meet or exceed Category 7A requirements up to 1 GHz.

Traditionally, a new-generation category of cabling is a performance superset of the previous-generation category; therefore the previous generation is a subset of the next generation. For example, Category 5e is a subset of Category 6A, which is a subset of the ISO/IEC's Category 7A as well as the TIA's in-progress Category 8. However, the performance specifications proposed by TIA for Category 8 are not a superset of ISO/IEC's Category 7A for several electrical-performance parameters.

So herein lays the conundrum: Category 8 is expected to have a different deployed channel topology and will not be a performance superset of Category 7A. In fact, for every transmission parameter except return loss, ISO/IEC Category 7A channel and permanent link limits are more severe than those proposed by TR-42.7 for Category 8 up to 1 GHZ. In the case of internal crosstalk parameters, the differences are significant, with Category 7A beating out Category 8 performance by more than 20 dB.

While Category 7A is currently specified to 1 GHz, work items such as IEC 61076-3-104, 3rd edition standard for Category 7A connectors are extending Category 7A performance characterization out to 2 GHz. Having two cabling specifications specified to 2 GHZ, with Category 8 having lower performance than Category 7A, will create confusion.

Blue bars indicate the extent to which ISO/IEC Category 7A electrical-performance requirements surpass those of TIA Category 8 at given frequencies. The PS NEXT loss figures shown in both charts reflect measurements taken at 500 MHz.

ISO/IEC faced the same "what-to-name-it" challenge with its new project to define two new grades of cabling (shielded and fully shielded) to support 40-Gbit/sec data transmission. ISO/IEC recently adopted Class I to describe cabling constructed from shielded modular RJ-45-style Category 8.1 components and Class II to describe cabling constructed from fully shielded Category 8.2 components.

Until the processing capabilities of a 40-Gbit/sec Ethernet (40GBase-T) application are finalized, it is too early to guarantee 40GBase-T application support distance for any media. However, Category 7A solutions remain the highest-performing commercially available twisted-pair cabling system. Not only do these solutions provide higher EMI/RFI immunity and more-flexible cable-sharing capabilities than RJ-45-style solutions, but ISO/IEC is actively working on a project to characterize the capability of existing Category 7A cabling to support 40-Gbit/sec data transmission. ::

Valerie Maguire is global sales engineer with The Siemon Company (www.siemon.com).

More CIM Articles
View Archived CIM Issues

Sponsored Recommendations

Cat 6A Frequently Asked Questions

April 29, 2024
At CommScope we know about network change and the importance of getting it right. Conclusion Category 6A cabling and connectivity.

Revolutionize Your Network with Propel Fiber Modules

Oct. 24, 2023
Four sizes of interchangeable Propel fiber modules provide the breadth of capabilities for virtually any configuration.

Elevate Your Network with Propel High-Density Panels

Oct. 24, 2023
Propel Series Sliding Fiber Optic Panels

Constellation™ - Explore power and data products

Oct. 24, 2023
Discover the Essentials for Building Your Power and Data System!