Looking for an Airflow Containment Solution? Here’s What to Consider

June 27, 2017
If you are looking to lower PUE through airflow containment, whether you manage a small or large enterprise data center, it is important to consider which type of containment method will be the most beneficial for your goals and budget. Read More...

As the average heat load per cabinet rises, simply arranging cabinets in a traditional open hot aisle/cold aisle configuration is no longer an effective approach. Despite many data center cooling solutions emerging in the market, airflow containment is still the most cost-effective, widely accepted and recommended path for reducing power usage efficiency (PUE).

Airflow containment—the isolation, redirection and recycling of hot exhaust air—leads to a variety of improved efficiencies, while reducing cooling energy costs. The energy saving benefits are so convincing, state and federal laws now require airflow containment as an energy efficiency measure in data centers.

If you are looking to lower PUE through airflow containment, whether you manage a small or large enterprise data center, it is important to consider which type of containment method will be the most beneficial for your goals and budget.

Vertical Exhaust Duct

With minimal budget and deployment time, a Vertical Exhaust Duct will be the most cost-effective option, as it is the simplest method to deploy and change. However, this system requires an overhead plenum and the addition of collars on air handler units to create a complete closed return.

Hot Aisle Containment (HAC)

The most popular airflow containment solution, HAC, comprises of a configuration of duct work and baffles that are set up over the hot aisle, with doors blocking the aisle entrances at either end. As such, the hot exhaust air from the room does not reach the adjacent cold aisles, and do not mix with the cold air. The hot exhaust air in the hot aisles is then returned to the cooling units, usually through drop ceiling plenums.

Cold Aisle Containment (CAC)

Typically used in retrofit environments where a raised floor cooling system already exists, CAC requires deployment by an entire row and additional end-of-row doors. One challenge of a CAC design is that it typically requires the fire suppression system to be redesigned.

If you are implementing or upgrading airflow management for a data center aisle containment solution, take into account your own business requirements and architectural limitations. The white paper below provides a comprehensive checklist of major considerations for each type of containment system and summarizes major differences between them.

Download “Data Center Airflow Management Basics: Comparing Containment Systems” now.

Sponsored Recommendations

Power up your system integration with Pulse Power - the game-changing power delivery system

May 10, 2023
Pulse Power is a novel power delivery system that allows System Integrators to safely provide significant power, over long distances, to remote equipment. It is a Class 4 power...

The Agile and Efficient Digital Building

May 9, 2023
This ebook explores how intelligent building solutions can help businesses improve network infrastructure management and optimize data center operations in enterprise buildings...

Network Monitoring- Why Tap Modules?

May 1, 2023
EDGE™ and EDGE8® tap modules enable passive optical tapping of the network while reducing downtime and link loss and increasing rack space utilization and density. Unlike other...

400G in the Data Center

Aug. 3, 2022
WHATS NEXT FOR THE DATA CENTER: 400G and Beyond