Standards update: Bend-insensitive multimode fiber

David Mazzarese, chair of the TIA TR-42.12 Task Force on Bend-Insensitive Multimode Fiber, charts the group's progress toward standardizing BIMMF.

Apr 26th, 2012
Pennwell web 180 110

By David Mazzarese, OFS/Chair, TIA TR-42.12 Task Force, Bend-Insensitive Multimode Fiber

Standardization of bend-insensitive multimode fiber (BIMMF) has been a very active area within TIA. Since the start of the year, more than a dozen contributions on the topic have been reviewed in the TIA working group TR-42.12 "Optical Fiber and Cable."

The figure in this story shows examples of refractive index profiles of standard and bend-insensitive multimode fibers. The major difference between the two fiber types is that the bend-insensitive fiber design can include an optical trench. While this trench improves the fiber's macrobend performance, it also causes additional light to be guided in "leaky modes" that are not present in standard multimode fibers.

All of the standardized measurements used to characterize multimode fiber were developed between the late 1980s and 2005. These measurement methods include numerical aperture, core diameter, overfilled bandwdith and differential mode delay (DMD). These standards were written prior to the introduction of BIMMF and may not appropriately characterize performance of multimode fibers with optical trenches.

It's important to note that the optical trench allows an additional group of leaky modes to propagate distances of a few hundred meters, on the length scale that is consistent with those found in data centers and enterprise networks. The discussion in the TIA working group centers on how to account for the leaky modes. There are two schools of thought. The first is using the standards as written, on the assumption that they accurately describe all graded-index multimode fibers. The other view is that the measurements need to be modified to account for leaky modes. The table included here summarizes the current test methods and the proposed modifications to each.

Current Test MethodProposed Modifications
Core DiameterFollow FOTP 455-58 (sample length per FOTP is 2 m)Modify FOTP 455-58 (increase sample length to 1 km)
Numerical Aperture (NA) MeasurementFollow FOTP 177 (sample length per FOTP is 2 m)Modify FOTP 177 (increase sample length to 1 km)
DMD MeasurementFollow FOTP 220 (sample length can range from a few hundred meters to any length that meets test requirementsModify FOTP 220 (require sample length to be less than or equal to 550 m)
Overfilled Bandwidth MeasurementFollow FOTP 204 (sample length can range from a few hundred meters to any length that meets test requirements)Modify FOTP 204 (require use of overfilled modal bandwidth/calculated method for a sample length less than or equal to 550 m)

What's interesting about the proposed modifications is that they have almost no impact on the measured values of standard multimode fibers, but they have a dramatic impact on the measured values of BIMMF. Analyses being conducted include modeling work, test-method comparisons, connection studies and system-performance tests. Results range from no difference to significant system impact.

At this point, the task force has not reached consensus on this point, and our goal is to resolve these differences in the near future. My guidance to the task group is that we standardize bend-insensitive multimode fibers in a way that will enable seamless interoperability between standard and bend-insensitive multimode fibers. Our objective is to ensure that no additional penalties for connection loss or bandwidth occur when these fibers are deployed in actual networks. Resolving the differences highlighted in the table remains our key focus.

More in Cabling Standards